Herd Immunity: Can It Save Us?

Herd immunity has been touted as a strategy to deal with COVID-19, preferably through a vaccine, but also naturally as a last resort if the virus continues to spread unmitigated.  What does this mean and will herd immunity be enough to keep us safe?


What is herd immunity?


Herd immunity refers to when enough of the population has been inoculated to a virus that it can no longer be a threat.  If someone gets a virus that others in their circle have already had and recovered from, or otherwise have been vaccinated against, it will stop there and not continue to spread due to others’ immunity. Because COVID-19 is a particularly deadly virus, at least 10x more deadly than the flu, exposing the populace to it as a way to get through it faster would have deadly consequences, especially if measures aren’t taken to protect the most vulnerable among us, and if there isn’t effective and well run public health infrastructure.


How is it achieved?


Herd immunity is usually achieved either through a vaccine or if enough of the population has become immune.  For example, measles requires 19 out of 20 people to have been vaccinated for effective herd immunity.  Ideally, with a virus as highly contagious as SARS-CoV-2, cases would be controlled and the spread of the virus mitigated through public policies such as lockdowns, social distancing protocol and mask mandates until a viable vaccine is created.


Is herd immunity possible with COVID-19?


Here is the underlying issue.  COVID-19 antibodies don’t seem to stick around for long.  This is bad for people and governments hoping that growing immunity would eventually stop the virus.  So far, there is no evidence that if you get COVID-19, that you can’t get it again.  On April 24th, the World Health Organization said that “there is currently no evidence that people who have recovered from COVID-19 and have antibodies are protected from a second infection.”


What does this mean for a vaccine?


There are currently 21 vaccines in clinical trials and 139 other vaccines in preclinical evaluation. Eventually we will get a safe and effective vaccine, preferably with a 75% efficacy rate by early 2021. However, Dr. Fauci has said that if 25% or more of the population refuses the vaccine, which is likely given the anti-science, anti-establishment, anti-vax prevalence in this country, a 75% effective vaccine will not be enough to reach herd immunity.  And that’s with the assumption that the vaccine would be that highly effective and that immunity would last.  More likely is a scenario of an initial vaccine with 40% efficacy and periodic boosters necessary to maintain immunity.  The end goal would be to “identify the best vaccine strategies able to overcome these problems and stimulate a large, sustained, optimal, immune response in the way the virus failed to do,” says Prof Danny Altmann, the British Society for Immunology spokesperson and Professor of Immunology at Imperial College London.


We don’t want to have the virus sweep through our entire population, killing the most vulnerable and decimating our communities until we reach a point where the majority (that’s left) is immune. But thanks to a lack of federal coordination and intervention, that is now what we are involuntarily hurtling towards.


In the back of our collective minds, there is an assumption that even if it is horrific and comes at the cost of many preventable deaths, there will at least be an eventual end to the chaos.  But that’s where we may be wrong. Current research shows that COVID-19 antibodies may last for as little as two months, and having had the virus is no guarantee that you won’t be reinfected–which leaves us with no definitive end in sight.


All hope is not lost.  New Zealand has declared the country free of any active COVID-19 cases.  Just yesterday, New York City, once the epicenter of the outbreak in the US, reported no new COVID-19 deaths.  This was achieved without a vaccine or herd immunity and if they can do it, other parts of the nation can do it, too.


Wear a mask, wash your hands, social distance and avoid poorly ventilated indoor spaces whenever possible.


Yours in Strength,

The Take Back Control Team

The COVID-19 Death Rate: Why It Hasn’t Caught Up To Us Yet

Politicians in the United States are continuing to congratulate themselves as the death rate of COVID-19 is still significantly lower than it was in the spring, despite recent surges in new cases across the country.  We should remember, even when we are around 800 deaths a day, that it is a horrible and preventable tragedy.  Experts have been quick to warn against spreading a false sense of security due to a currently lower death rate. There are several reasons for the lag but rest assured, the deaths will start to catch up.

The recommended quarantine time, if you have symptoms of the virus or a confirmed case, is two weeks.  If people are going to have symptoms, they usually appear sometime in the two weeks or so after having contracted it.  The lag between contracting the virus and dying, however, can be much longer and is not as easily estimated. “This particular part of the epidemic is just taking off, and we’re still on the runway,” said Thomas Giordano, chief of infectious diseases at Baylor College of Medicine in Houston. “The last thing to happen is the death. We just aren’t that far along with this one yet.”

Another reason for the lag is data collection and reporting.  Sometimes reporting a death can take up to three weeks, so deaths may be far ahead of what is being broadcast at the time.  And some states aren’t reporting important information like COVID related hospitalizations and other data points useful for predicting where the death rate is heading.  We’re only as good as our data, and thanks to our leadership’s inability to handle logistics and start an effective testing initiative, we don’t have much.

A third reason we have lower instances of death despite the continued spikes, is that more young people may be getting it (and spreading it!).  But as we’re starting to realize, COVID-19 can have horrible, debilitating and scary lasting effects that we are just learning about.  From increased heart rates to diminished lung capacity and brain trauma, the long term effects will still be hugely significant even if not as many people are dying.

“It’s a false narrative to take comfort in a lower rate of death,” said Dr. Fauci at a press conference. “There’s so many other things that are very dangerous and bad about this virus, don’t get yourself into a false complacency.”  Even if you are young and healthy, no one knows how this virus will affect you, personally.  There are plenty of young people in serious conditions and many people who have survived COVID-19 but are living with terrible side effects.

Wash your hands, wear your mask, social distance, and stay home as much as possible.

Yours in Strength,

The Take Back Control Team

A Crisis Within A Crisis: How COVID-19 Is Making The Opioid Epidemic Worse

COVID-19 has pushed many national emergencies into the background. One of the major issues that has taken a backseat in the midst of pandemic chaos is the opioid epidemic. While it doesn’t have the same fear inducing numbers as the pandemic, in 2018, 47,600 people died from opioid related overdoses.  With the coronavirus dominating our collective resources, headlines and energy, it is difficult to quantify exactly how much the virus is worsening the opioid epidemic, but media in regions all across America are reporting increasing opioid related fatalities. Fentanyl and cocaine cut with fentanyl are responsible for much of the overdoses.

Take Dupage County in Illinois just West of Chicago.  Dupage County has reported a sharp spike in overdose deaths this past May. “In the past three weeks, we have had 20 overdose deaths, mainly due to opioids,” said Richard Jorgensen, MD, the DuPage County coroner.

This trend can be seen in areas across the country.  Why is this happening?

There are a few potential reasons.  First, it is possible that there is a new, deadlier drug combination circulating.  Fentanyl and drugs cut with fentanyl is often consumed unknowingly and is incredibly deadly.

Second, while the emergence of the widespread usage of telehealth in lieu of in person check-ups has increased access for some, lack of internet and/or computers has made it more difficult to receive treatment for others. The American Medical Association has issued a report that details what actions states can take to help those battling with opioid addiction during the COVID-19 crisis.  Some of these steps include the following:

  • Governors must adopt the new SAMHSA and DEA rules and guidance in-full for the duration of the national emergency—this includes flexibility for evaluation and prescribing requirements using telemedicine;
  • States must enact as part of their own Emergency Orders and other actions a complete removal of prior authorization, step therapy and other administrative barriers for medications used to treat opioid use disorder;
  • States must remove existing barriers for patients with pain to obtain necessary medications. This includes removing arbitrary dose, quantity and refill restrictions on controlled substances; and
  • States must enact, implement and support harm reduction strategies, including removing barriers to sterile needle and syringe services programs.

For more information, you can read the full report here.

Social distancing, isolation and stress have also increased the onset of mental health disorders and precipitated relapses among many who suffer from substance abuse, and can make current usage heavier in those currently struggling with addiction.  “As you may have seen, Friday night to Saturday night our county saw 28 nonfatal overdoses—this is a high number for our county,” said Anahi Ortiz, MD, referencing Franklin County, Ohio. “COVID-19 has showed us the vulnerabilities and deficiencies in our addiction services—in addition, it has increased the mental health needs of this population.”

As mentioned, the current reigning chaos makes it difficult to fully understand the scope of the problem and its eventual impact.  Increases in suicide, substance abuse, non-COVID-19 deaths from an overburdened and failing private medical system, people who died from COVID-19 at home and never made it to a hospital, the opioid epidemic–the impact of all of these will be something we are left to attempt to quantify and understand in the aftermath of the pandemic.  We do, however, have concrete and actionable items that states can take in order to mitigate the effect of COVID-19 on those already suffering from another deadly public health crisis.

To read more about how COVID-19 is worsening the opioid epidemic, click here.

Yours in Strength,

The Take Back Control Team

The Second Wave: What It Means And When It Will Hit

Are we in a second wave?

As COVID cases began to rise across the country in the last month, both in places that hadn’t previously had outbreaks as well as in places that had managed to flatten the curve before attempting to reopen, media outlets and politicians heralded the continued spread of the virus as the coming of a dreaded ‘second wave.’  While exact definitions of a second wave are ambiguous, it generally refers to a subsequent sustained rise in cases after a first wave has been effectively contained and there has been a substantial decrease in cases. But as Dr. Fauci was quick to point out, we never effectively contained the initial outbreak and so we are, still, in the midst of a first wave that has been something of a roller coaster with 100,000 daily new cases starting to look like an inevitability.

Is a second wave coming?

This is complicated.  For there to be a ‘second wave,’ the first wave has to end.  Originally, it was thought that a second wave would crash on us in the fall.  The White House has already publicly announced that they are preparing for just such a scenario.  However, as the spread of the virus spins out of control with the CDC admitting that there is now “too much virus” to control, it seems more likely that we will see a continued increase in cases with fall and winter compounding its toll.  Influenza, more commonly known as the seasonal flu, plus colder weather potentially means less of a second wave and more of an additional tsunami.  When you factor in hospital capacity, unemployment levels and the thousands upon thousands of evictions that are imminent without federal intervention, we’re looking at a mosaic of chaos waiting for us this fall.

What can we do?

While it’s not looking good–efforts to contain the virus now are distinctly too little too late and some governors are even now refusing to roll back reopening even with record  numbers of cases in their jurisdictions–mitigating the spread could be surprisingly simple.  Despite earlier ambiguity, there is now a plethora of evidence that widespread and consistent mask usage is extremely effective in reducing the spread of the virus.  One study found that if 80% of a population wore face masks, the transmission rate would drop to 8%.  We can’t wait for a vaccine or miracle cure and there is evidence that antibodies don’t last long enough to provide immunity.  For now, strict social distancing and mask usage coupled with a stimulus package big enough to bolster the US economy and its citizens are our best bet to making it out to the other side of COVID-19.

Yours in Strength,

The Take Back Control Team

Childcare On The Brink Of Collapse

Perhaps more than anything else, the pandemic has revealed America’s weak spots; cracks in our societal infrastructure that have been ready to crumble for quite some time.  One of these exploited fissures that is now strained to the point of breaking is childcare.  Even before COVID-19 decimated the economy and public health system, childcare was an issue demanding national attention.  With the average childcare worker making $10.72 an hour and it being more expensive in half of states to enroll a child in daycare than public universities, it is a system destined to fail without significant reform.  Birth rates in the US have hit a 32 year low and according to potential parents, financial instability and the enormous costs associated with children is the main reason why.


Enter COVID-19.


So far the virus has caused at least 336,000 childcare workers to lose their jobs.  61% of parents say that their childcare provider has closed.  And those that remain have increased costs due to new safety protocols and less children enrolling.  Childcare workers continue to make less than 98% of other American workers despite their designation as essential workers. As COVID-19 cases reach past 50,000 new cases a day with 100,000 daily cases in the forecast, it doesn’t look like schools will be reopening at full capacity in the fall.  Many schools are looking into hybrid options–offering a combination of significantly reduced class time and remote learning.  Which leaves both the childcare industry and parents at loose ends.


Was childcare always like this? Expensive, underappreciated, barely limping forward? The answer is no, it wasn’t.  In fact, there is great precedent for a well funded, federally subsidized national childcare system. In 1940 the Lanham Act was passed to accommodate the increase of working mothers due to World War II. The historic bill provided federally subsidized childcare centers nationwide.  They included medical clinics and infirmeries and provided shoppers to pick up items on personalized grocery lists for the working mothers. Children enrolled in these programs grew up to be more likely to be employed and earn higher salaries. 90% of those who participated in a survey at the time said that the centers should be even more widely established. However, funding was stopped and the program shut down after the war ended.  In 1971 we once again came close to passing federally subsidized childcare across the nation but Nixon vetoed it.  In contrast to the efforts of the past, the White House’s proposed 2018 fiscal budget cut $100 million for military childcare programs and the childcare act that was introduced was based on tax deductions that both parties found mostly benefited the rich.


Several senators have called for funding childcare centers through the crisis. Sen. Patty Murrey was instrumental in getting $3.5 billion included in the CARES Act for nationwide childcare assistance for low income families and has since introduced legislation with Rep. Rosa L. DeLauro and Rep. Robert C. Scott that would establish a $50 billion Child Care Stabilization Fund.  Republicans, however, have so far blocked any attempts to pass any proposal that would aid the American people, dragging their feet on a second stimulus bill and refusing to pass the HEROES Act introduced by the Democrats.  It is clear that without further aid, the childcare system in the United States will not make it through to the other side of this crisis and until schools are able to reopen fully, parents, and subsequently their jobs and the economy, will suffer.


We’ve included some quotes from parents and childcare providers below about their current predicament.  To read more accounts, click here.


“I want Congress and policymakers to know that child care providers have been forgotten as heroes and essential workers. I see support for front line medical staff, and grocery employees, mail carriers and teachers (rightfully so!). But who is thanking the people who open their programs to the children of these people? Who is acknowledging the risk these men and women put themselves and their families in direct contact with by accepting these children, every day? And who is talking about how LITTLE these men and women are compensated for as they continue to teach and address the social-emotional needs of these children? I can afford to pay my child care provider while not attending, but only just. And I know that she is not getting paid what she deserves. I would love for Congress and policymakers to know that child care providers are an abused resource to the communities they serve, and I would love to see them get the spotlight they deserve as they step up (as they’ve ALWAYS done) in this time of crisis.” -– Chelsea, parent from Rochester, NY.


“As a small private child care provider serving few essential workers, we made the difficult decision to close for the protection and safety of our children, families, and staff. Our future is uncertain, and we need fiscal relief for our employees and our ability to sustain this circumstance.” – Michele, child care provider from Tracy, CA.


Yours in Strength,

The Take Back Control Team

Contact Tracing And The Fight Against COVID-19: How We Failed

By this time, most Americans have a general idea of what contact tracing is and its role in curtailing the spread of the virus. In simplest terms, it’s when a healthcare worker reaches out to you to inform you that you have been in contact with someone infected with COVID-19.  They advise potentially infected people to get tested and to self-isolate for 2 weeks.  It’s one of the most effective methods of tracking down the virus and stopping it from spiraling out of control and has been used with great success in Wuhan, South Korea, Singapore and many other places that have successfully curbed their outbreaks.  It is most effective when used in conjunction with a robust testing initiative, social distancing and reliable mask wearing.


As the pandemic rages out of control, with new daily cases climbing in 40 states, you may be wondering at our own approach to getting a handle on the virus and where we are, as a nation, in responding to this crisis.  There was a lot of talk earlier in the year about the importance of contact tracing. And while there were valid concerns over privacy and outsourcing, it was agreed across the board that it was essential in fighting COVID-19. So what happened?


It is estimated that for a contact tracing program to be effective in the United States, we would need roughly 300,000 tracers. Right now, 4 months into a catastrophic pandemic, we have under 40,000 (just under 70,000 if you include the plans to recruit the National Guard, Americorps and volunteers) with only 8 states meeting the staff numbers necessary to effectively contain their respective cases.  It doesn’t help that there has been no united federal response, leaving states on their own to organize and implement large scale programs with no guidance. And unfortunately, many states reopened before an appropriate contact tracing program was launched and whatever flattening of the curve we were able to accomplish during the months of lockdowns across the country, has been wiped out in a matter of weeks.


The CDC recently announced that COVID-19 is now too widespread to control the way other countries already successfully have and that it is, “really the beginning.”  Dr. Fauci warned last Tuesday that the US would soon be 100,000 new cases a day and said just this Sunday that a vaccine, whenever that arrives, may not be enough to achieve herd immunity.  So what’s the answer?  We may be able to bolster our contact tracing programs.  It seems like an elegant way of putting a significant amount of the recently unemployed back to work.  But while some states are starting to expand their programs, it’s looking like too little too late.


All hope is not lost, though the road ahead will be difficult and we can now mitigate only so much.  But while government officials are dragging their feet passing another stimulus bill and reinstituting lock downs, Hong Kong has been able to effectively control it’s viral spread by consistent mask wearing.  Now we just have to convince our fellow citizens to put on their own masks.


To take Johns Hopkins’ free online contact tracing course, click here.

To get work as a contact tracer, contact your local health department for more information.


Yours in Strength,

The Take Back Control Team


White House COVID-19 Safety Protocol

Question: What steps does the White House take to ensure COVID-19 doesn’t come near the president?


  • Daily COVID-19 tests for the President and staff
  • Daily temperature checks
  • Regular deep cleaning
  • Social distancing protocol
  • Testing of all guests
  • Voluntary face coverings encouraged

What you can do at home:

What can you learn from this and how can you apply White House protocol to your home?  You probably can’t receive daily, or even regular, COVID-19 tests but if tests are free and available in your area, get tested and know your status and the status of those in your household.  Click here to find a testing location in your area.

Social distancing might not be possible, especially in apartments or smaller households but if you or anyone else you live with is exhibiting symptoms, do your best to self-isolate the sick individual if possible and disinfect common areas and frequently touched surfaces.

Daily temperature checks are possible! Get a thermometer and regularly check the temperature of all residents.  You can even check the temperature of guests before they enter your house if you’re socializing outside of your housemates. Be sure to disinfect the thermometer between uses or use separate thermometers.

Regular deep cleaning is a lot to ask of most people and you probably don’t have White House staff to come in and make everything spic and span.  But regularly wiping down frequently touched surfaces with EPA approved products and keeping common areas clean is a must!  Click here to learn how to make your own EPA approved disinfectants.

It’s unlikely that people will wear masks inside (unless someone you live with has tested or is suspected to be COVID-19 positive) but you should absolutely wear face coverings if you are venturing outside or in crowds.  Remember to stay 6 feet back from other people whenever possible.

We hope you implement these measures and take the White House COVID-19 prevention protocol as a good example of what American households should be doing to protect themselves.

Yours in Strength,

The Take Back Control Team

Imminent Evictions

A huge fall out of the coronavirus and lack of government intervention is the avalanche of evictions heading our way.  This renter’s crisis has already begun as states reopen and eviction moratorium and mortgage freezes are lifted.  There are roughly 110 million Americans in rental units and even before the pandemic ground the economy to a halt, the US was averaging about 300,000 eviction requests a month.  Now, with so many people losing their jobs, or unable to receive the full paycheck they used to, many are left without any options and have been forced to rely on the mercy of their landlords, who also have to pay mortgages and answer to banks.  The Amherst real estate firm estimates that 28 million households are now at risk of eviction. A travesty that local and federal government should have prevented.


The federal freeze on mortgages guaranteed by the CARES Act only applies to mortgages that are federally subsidized or buildings with federally backed mortgages and it expires on July 25th.  There has been no federal eviction stay or rent freeze.  Instead, it has been left up to local and state governments to protect tenants.  Most places have passed anti-evictions mandates, or more accurately, eviction postponements, but they vary widely and often contradict themselves in overlapping areas.  They have no legal precedent, leaving officials, landlords and tenants unsure of how to proceed.


Some landlords are bypassing the law, serving self-help evictions.  “Self-help” evictions are illegal and usually involve the landlord shutting off utilities, locking residents out of their homes and/or putting their stuff out in the street.  While this is a horrible problem during the best of times, during COVID, it is especially heinous.  Nobody should be forced out of their home due to the unmitigated and preventable spread of COVID-19. Other countries who quickly implemented effective measures are seeing under 100 new daily cases.  On Friday, Florida alone saw 9,000.


With over 44 million Americans filing for unemployment, small businesses being forced to close their doors and 22.5% of all households at risk of eviction, we desperately need another stimulus package.  And we need at least the $100 billion in rental and housing assistance outlined in the HEROES Act.  We need more food assistance and programs. We need the unemployment expansion to be extended as long as the pandemic lasts.  We need our tax dollars to be put towards the safety and wellbeing of the American people, not just loopholes for the wealthy and costly government bailouts for corporations that continue to fire workers.


While the economic repercussions are and will be severe and quantifiable, the psychological toll of debt and homelessness will be incalculable and long lasting.


If you need information, templates, and/or state specific resources, visit the National Housing Law Project’s page here.


Yours in Strength,

The Take Back Control Team

The Status of the Next Stimulus Package

The situation in the US is dire across all fronts. From public health to the economy, hard working everyday Americans are suffering as COVID-19 spreads unchecked and cases reach new daily highs and workers and businesses desperate to support themselves place themselves in dangerous conditions to try to make ends meet.


The CARES Act was a bandaid without the necessary infrastructure to effectively distribute aid. Riddled with loopholes that diverted what should have been funds for small businesses and struggling citizens to big business and the top income earners, the provisions that allow recipients to tread water are coming to an end.  The unemployment expansion only runs through July, small business loans that didn’t cover costs to begin with are dwindling as the pandemic continues with no end in sight and a renters’ crisis with mass evictions is set to devastate upwards of 23 million inhabitants throughout the country when eviction freezes expire.


And that’s just the beginning.


Over 44 million Americans have filed for unemployment.  Many have not yet received anything from the outdated and overburdened unemployment systems or their $1200 stimulus checks, for that matter. Businesses have reopened and then been forced to close and then reopen in a macabre cycle as servers get sick while states stubbornly refuse to go back into a lockdown.


But how can you go into lockdown when the government won’t financially support its citizens during a crisis?  These are our tax dollars that are given freely to corporations as we are beaten over the head with disdain and accusations of handouts and laziness.


The HEROES Act passed the House but is dead in the Senate.  And while Trump is supportive of another stimulus check, the leadership in the Senate isn’t convinced and refuses to even begin discussions for a second stimulus bill until sometime in July.  And when they do finally get around to doing the job that we, as American citizens, pay them to do, Mitch McConnell doesn’t want anything passed that has more than $1 trillion in aid and is requiring a provision that ensures this next stimulus bill is the last–a dangerous and potentially catastrophic proposal as we deal with a crisis made infinitely worse by lack of competent government intervention and that has no end in sight.


Many representatives have advocated for actual solutions; $2,000 a month for households until the end of the crisis proposed by both Senator Kamala Harris and Representative Ro Khanna. The HEROES Act has options for debt relief, student loan relief, hazard pay, housing and food assistance. It extends the unemployment expansion for another 6 months and gives much needed funding to local governments.  It’s a good start, better than the CARES Act, but even if it passes (which looks extremely unlikely given some leaders’ reluctance to come to their country’s aid), the first stimulus bill showed us how poorly managed the implementation and roll out of these programs are.  What does a second stimulus check matter if you never got the first?


Clearly, there is much work to be done and endless obstacles.  As America teeters on the brink of systemic collapse, let us hope our lawmakers see that their self-preservation is tied to our own. We all go down with this ship.


Yours in Strength,

The Take Back Control Team

The Final Word on Masks

Since the pandemic began, masks have been a point of controversy.  Are they effective in limiting the spread of the virus? How effective? Can they be harmful? Who should be wearing them?  And what types of masks work best? Back and forth and over the background of the continuous spread of the virus, government officials, healthcare workers and the World Health Organization have sent mixed messages.  So what’s the final word?


First, we were told that only healthcare workers and those with underlying conditions should be wearing masks. This was for good reason.  At the time, Personal Protective Equipment was in short supply and the bulk of masks needed to be prioritized for frontline healthcare workers.  When Dr. Fauci was questioned by Congress in a recent hearing about whether he regretted the messaging about masks in the early stages of the pandemic, he said, “I do not regret that. Let me explain to you what happened. At that time, there was a paucity of equipment that our health care providers needed who put themselves daily in harm’s way of taking care of people who are ill.”  However, by late March as PPE became more widely available and it had become clear that people who are asymptomatic or pre-symptomatic were also contagious, everyone was advised to wear a face mask. 


Here’s the thing.  While the mixed messages may have been frustrating, masks, definitively and unquestionably, work.  In some cases, they have been shown to be an essential part in curtailing the spread, along with frequent handwashing and lockdowns.  And if America is going to insist on reopening, the least we can all do is wear a mask.  They are not harmful.  The masks worn by the general public will not cause hypercapnia–that has been thoroughly debunked.


Cloth masks may not be as good as N95 or professional grade masks, but they are still much, much better than nothing. After New York City began requiring masks in public settings, the new daily infection rates dropped by 3% each day.  A British study found that when 50% of a population regularly wore face masks, it “reduced COVID-19 spread to an R of less than 1.0, flattening future disease waves and allowing for less stringent lockdowns.”


Masks may be annoying and uncomfortable but mild discomfort in exchange for your health and the health of those around you is a no brainer and shouldn’t be the source of a national debate. Especially as states reopen and the American people go back to work where social distancing and limiting interactions to the open air is not possible. Enclosed spaces that people are stuck in are more likely to facilitate the spread of the virus and the 6 feet back rule does not apply to such areas where droplets can linger and saturate the confined dimensions of, for example, an office.

Be a patriot. Wear a mask.

To learn how to make a mask from home made materials as effective as possible, click here.


Yours in Strength,

The Take Back Control Team